🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.